The purpose of our research is to draw the outline of an unitary system involving these means of constraint, while actually they are ruled through disseminated juridical regulations. Our research attempts to improve the legislative frame of this matter through the suggestions we are formulating. Our aim is to elucidate the problem of admissibility acknowledgement and as well to clarify, for each mean of constraint, its specific juridical regime, which pertains to their various domains of applying. We are discussing either about comminatory compensations, comminatory amercements or about other atypical means of constraint. Comminatory compensations are the object ruled by some special laws, while comminatory amercements were expressedly mentioned by the Civil Procedure Code, in dispositions of high generality. The enforcement of the Civil Code and of the Civil Procedure Code Laws has created a climate of intense scientific debates. We do sustain the opinion that it is imperative to integrate in these fundamental normative acts such a system able to organize functionally the means of execution’s constraint. These means have proven their efficiency, in comparison with the classical execution’s procedures.