Science and metaphysics are endeavours concerned with understanding and explaining reality. They are said to be preoccupied with the search for the knowledge of our universe. However, while science is considered a sensible enterprise and extolled as supreme in understanding our world, metaphysics is dismissed by some thinkers as nonsensical. This view was majorly championed by the logical positivists who through their verificationist proposal held that only propositions about matters of fact are meaningful. Metaphysics for them does not meet the verificationist criterion and so lacks sense. The logical positivists’ proposal is akin to that of Hume who had earlier disparaged metaphysics and asserted that any book that contains metaphysical postulates should be committed to the flames because they are nonsensical. The Humean and logical positivists’ dismissal of metaphysics as nonsensical is still prevalent among some thinkers today. Atheris, for instance, contends that metaphysics does not help us arrive at any relevant truth. Accordingly, he dismissed it as infantile, ridiculous endeavour. This paper argues that metaphysics is not nonsensical. This hinges on the view that it offers a good understanding of our world, deals with issues that science cannot handle. The paper notes that science, in spite of its lofty height, has limits. More so, science has its underpinning on metaphysics. Thus, without metaphysics there can be no science. The paper, therefore, considers it absurd to dismiss metaphysics as nonsensical while accepting science which shares the knack of metaphysics as sensible. Metaphysics, the paper concludes, is sensible.